By: Willard
> Climate models used to project future climate change appear to not even conserve energy despite the fact that global warming is, fundamentally, a conservation of energy issue. That looks stronger...
View ArticleBy: Nate
Nice to see both sides of the argument discussed this way. Good points made by both. I don’t think it is correct to claim that climate models are relied upon by the public or congress to determine...
View ArticleBy: Entropic man
Tom Martin Observations do not show low ECS A very basic back of the envelope calculation notes that CO2 concentration has increased by 50% from 280ppm to 420ppm. Meanwhile temperatures have risen by...
View ArticleBy: Tim S
So the question remains to answered. Who is the real shenanigator and which website engages in the most shenanigation?
View ArticleBy: Nabil Swedan
In my opinion Dr. Schmidts claim of cherry picking of data based on geographic location and season is not scientific. More important is how representative is the data for evaluating climate models....
View ArticleBy: Tim S
In reply to Nate. Nate, I respectfully disagree. Public perception is part of the problem with claims of a climate crisis. Young people are not in a position to make observations about “the worst...
View ArticleBy: Nabil Swedan
In reply to Nabil Swedan. Correction for the last paragraph As you can see from Fig. 1 of this paper, it is inconceivable that the heat storage between 1950 and 2011 to be 10 times greater than that...
View ArticleBy: Entropic man
More discussion of the hot model problem. https://www.theclimatebrink.com/p/revisiting-the-hot-model-problem
View ArticleBy: Willard
In reply to Entropic man. Thanks, EM. After reading the article in full, I can state that it is well written, informative, and based on sound scientific analysis. It answers TS’ question as to whom is...
View ArticleBy: Bevan Dockery
CO2 is a simple molecule with a carbon atom inline between a pair of oxygen atoms. It does not generate heat in any way whatsoever so it cannot increase the temperature of anything in the environment....
View ArticleBy: Willard
In reply to Willard. … and Andrew too! I also forgot to add that I rather liked these bits: > They could have stated something to the effect that the science is open to discussion However, its worth...
View ArticleBy: Nate
In reply to Nate. Sorry, but it is simply the reality that public perception moves the needle on policy. The public can perfectly well understand that 2023 was the warmest on record. They can perfectly...
View ArticleBy: E. Swanson
Roy, I was late to the party and did not comment on your latest article for the Heritage Foundation. One problem which has always concerned me about your work is the method used to compare the various...
View ArticleBy: Tim S
In reply to Nate. Nate, thank you for proving my point that anecdotal belief by the public currently defies scientific analysis.
View ArticleBy: Curious George
In reply to Tom Martin. “The model estimates are based upon theory.” Or upon an unquantified feeling what makes a “pretty good assumption”, see...
View ArticleBy: Bindidon
In reply to Bevan Dockery. ” CO2 is a simple molecule with a carbon atom inline between a pair of oxygen atoms. It does not generate heat in any way whatsoever so it cannot increase the temperature of...
View ArticleBy: David Ramsay
After watching the video TV “debate” between Drs Spencer and Schmidt it is clear who the professional is. Dr Spencer presented himself both in appearance and conduct as professional and dignified....
View ArticleBy: Entropic man
In reply to skeptikal. But in science that’s usually the way to bet, especially when you know the mechanism causing the correalation.
View Article
